Stephen Flatley

The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the defense's motion to preclude testimony by FBI Forensic Examiner Stephen Flatley, asserting that his testimony is fact-based and not expert opinion, and that even if it were considered expert testimony, the prosecution provided sufficient notice under Rule 16.

The letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to defense counsel outlines the expected testimony of Computer Forensic Examiner Stephen Flatley regarding his analysis of digital devices and metadata. Flatley's testimony is expected to cover the forensic examination of devices, the process of creating 'clones' of digital media, and the analysis of metadata associated with certain files. The government asserts that Flatley's testimony is based on his first-hand knowledge and does not require expert testimony under Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

This letter, dated November 27, 2021, is from defense attorney Laura A. Menninger to the prosecution team in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It provides a supplement to the disclosure for Certified Forensic Examiner Robert Kelso's expert opinion, detailing his anticipated testimony on metadata analysis. The letter also objects to the government's untimely supplemental notice for their expert witness, Stephen Flatley.

The defense is objecting to the government's late disclosure of expert opinion testimony by Stephen Flatley, arguing that it was untimely and should be precluded. The government had previously claimed Flatley would only offer fact testimony, but the defense argues that the November 26, December 3, and December 5 disclosures reveal expert opinion testimony.

The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the defense's motion to preclude testimony by FBI Forensic Examiner Stephen Flatley, asserting that his testimony is fact-based and not expert opinion, and that even if it were considered expert testimony, the prosecution provided sufficient notice under Rule 16.

The letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to defense counsel outlines the expected testimony of Computer Forensic Examiner Stephen Flatley regarding his analysis of digital devices and metadata. Flatley's testimony is expected to cover the forensic examination of devices, the process of creating 'clones' of digital media, and the analysis of metadata associated with certain files. The government asserts that Flatley's testimony is based on his first-hand knowledge and does not require expert testimony under Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.