Minor Victim-3

To: Nathan NYSD Chambers. Date: 07 Nov 2021. Subject: US v. Maxwell - Letter re Minor Victim-3

To: Nathan NYSD Chambers aillIMMI. Date: 06 Nov 2021. Subject: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 - Letter re Minor Victim-3

The government's memorandum argues against the defendant's motions in limine, addressing the admissibility of expert testimony by Dr. Lisa Rocchio, evidence related to Minor Victim-3 and Minor Victim-4, and co-conspirator statements. The government asserts that the evidence and testimony in question are relevant and admissible under various rules of evidence.

The court orders the Government to clarify its position on whether 'Alleged Victim-3' can be considered a 'victim' of the crimes charged in the indictment for purposes of restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(2). The Government had previously submitted a supplemental letter regarding its opposition to the defense motion to exclude evidence of Minor Victim-3. The court requires the Government to state its position on this issue by a specific deadline.

The government's memorandum argues against the defendant's motions to exclude certain evidence and testimony, including expert testimony by Dr. Lisa Rocchio, evidence related to Minor Victim-3 and Minor Victim-4, and co-conspirator statements. The government asserts that this evidence is admissible and relevant to the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing that Minor Victim-3's testimony is admissible as direct evidence or under Rule 404(b) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The government claims that Minor Victim-3's testimony will help establish Maxwell's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and her involvement in the alleged conspiracies.