JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA

The passage only contains attorney names and contact information for a filing on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. It provides no substantive allegations, transactions, dates, or connections to powerful ac Document dated March 17, 2017 Signed by attorney Laura A. Menninger and pro hac vice counsel Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Ty Gee Filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell

The passage provides a vague reference to an investigation and a deposition about knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's status, but lacks concrete details, specific actors, dates, or financial information. I Reference to a witness possibly unaware of an investigation Mention of Jeffrey Epstein's jail time and sex offender registration Court dialogue between attorneys Pagliuca and Cassell

The document is merely a procedural certificate of service with no substantive allegations, names of influential actors, financial details, or controversy. It provides no actionable investigative lead Filed electronically on Oct 21, 2016 via CM/ECF Served to parties: Laura A. Menninger, Esq.; Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. Law firm: Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C., Denver

January 4, 2024 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell, Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Pursuant to the Court’s December 18, 2023, unsealing order, and following conferral with Defendant, Plaintiff files this set of documents ordered unsealed. The filing of these documents ordered unsealed will be done on a rolling basis until completed. This filing also excludes documents pertaining to Does 105 (see December 28, 2023, Email Correspondence with Chambers), 107, and 110 (see ECF No. 1319), while the Court’s review of those documents is ongoing. Respectfully, /s/ Sigrid S. McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley cc: Counsel of Record (via ECF) Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1325 Filed 01/04/24 Page 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. 15-cv-07433-RWS --------------------------------------------------X RESPONSE TO NON-PARTY SHARON CHURCHER’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA ............................................. Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca HADDON, MORGAN, AND FOREMAN, P.C. East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1325-1 Filed 01/04/24 Page 1 of 21 i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................. 2 I. CHURCHER IS A MATERIAL FACT WITNESS AND WAS NOT ACTING AS A JOURNALIST ......................................................................................

H A D D O N MORGAN FOREMAN November 1, 2021 VIA EMAIL United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Counsel: Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.0 Jeffrey S. Pagliuca 150 East lOth Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 www.hrnflaw.com Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell through counsel, submit the following summary pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(b)(1)(C). I. EXPERT DISCLOSURE BY THE DEFENSE A. Dr. Elizabeth Loftus Dr. Loftus is the Distinguished Professor of Psychological Science and Law at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. Dr. Loftus is one of the nation's leading experts on the science of memory. In addition to her experience as an academic and clinical researcher, she has been an expert witness or consultant in hundreds of cases. Her extensive experience and credentials are recited in her curriculum vitae. Exhibit A. It is expected that Dr. Lof

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------- x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) ------------------------------------------------------- x MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MS. MAXWELL’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX OF THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT BECAUSE THE ALLEGED MISSTATEMENTS ARE NOT PERJURIOUS AS A MATTER OF LAW Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menn