Debra C. Freeman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: Docket #1:19-cv-08673- DOE, JANE, KPF-DCF Plaintiff, - against - INDYKE, et al., : New York, New York June 24, 2020 Defendants. TELEPHONE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HONORABLE JUDGE DEBRA C. FREEMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE JUDGE APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff: For the Defendants: KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP BY: ROBERTA A. KAPLAN, ESQ. KATE L. DONIGER, ESQ. 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110 New York, New York 10118 212-763-0883 TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP BY: BENNET J. MOSKOWITZ, ESQ. 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 212-704-6087 TROUTMAN SANDERS BY: MOLLY S. DIRAGO, ESQ. 227 W. Monroe Street, Suite 3900 Chicago, Illinois 60606 312-759-1926 Transcription Service: Carole Ludwig, Transcription Services 155 East Fourth Street #3C New York, New York 10009 Phone: (212) 420-0771 Email: Transcription420@aol.com Proceedings conducted telephonically and recorded by electronic so

1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOE 1, et al., : 19-CV-07675 (GBD) Plaintiffs, v. : 500 Pearl Street JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al., : New York, New York Defendants. : November 21, 2019 X VE, Plaintiff, : 19-CV-07625 (AJN) v. NINE EAST 71st STREET, et al., Defendants. X TRANSCRIPT OF CIVIL CAUSE FOR CONFERENCE BEFORE THE HONORABLE DEBRA C. FREEMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE APPEARANCES: For Jane Doe 1: ARICK W. FUDALI, ESQ. The Bloom Firm [Appearances continue next page.) Court Transcriber: MARY GRECO T eWrite Word Processing Service Proceedings recorded by electronic sound recording, transcript produced by transcription service EFTA00078895 嘞 14 14 bJ 一 一 I- I- I- I- 一 一 I- I- J對 l与） 尸 。 \D 曲 。、 u1 a uj l'3 尸 。 \D 曲 峭 。、 lJ1 a l』J 一 笋 叼 「 渺 為 渺 老 D 国 仂 。 。 z 『 H z a 国 U " 喲 。 鬥 ＜ 国 “ 毫 。 烤 嘞

Case 1:19-cv-10475-LGS-DCF Document 68 Filed 05/13/20 Page 1 of 3 H A D D O N MORGAN FOREMAN May 13, 2020 VIA ECF Hon. Debra Freeman United States Magistrate Judge Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: 19-cv- 10475 (LGS-DCF) Dear Judge Freeman: Haddon, Morgan and Foreman. r.c Laura A. MannInger ISO East 10th Avenue Denver. Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 rx 303.832.2628 www.hmflaw.corn Imenningerathmflaw.com v. Darren K Indyke, et aL On behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, I write under Judge Schofield's Individual Rules and Procedures for Civil Cases III(A)(1) and this Court's Practices II(A) to request a pre-motion conference concerning our anticipated Motion to Stay Discovery under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c)(1). Counsel conferred in good faith with both Plaintiff and Defendant Co-Executors of the Estate. Plaintiff does not consent to a stay as indicated on a telephonic conferral conference on April 28. The Co-

EXHIBIT C EFTA00095331 Case 1:19-cv-10475-LGS-DCF Document 72 Filed 05/18/20 Page 1 of 3 BSF VIA ECF BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER The Honorable Debra C. Freeman Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: May 18, 2020 v. Darren K. Indyke, Richard D. Kahn, & Ghislaine Maxwell, 19-10475-LGS-DCF Dear Judge Freeman: Pursuant to Individual Rule I.D, Plaintiff hereby responds to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's request for a pre-motion conference in connection with her anticipated motion to stay discovery in this matter. The Court should deny Maxwell's motion for a pre-motion conference and deny her anticipated motion in its entirety because, as explained below, each of Maxwell's reasons for staying discovery is meritless and the motion is simply another attempt to unjustifiably delay this litigation. First, a pending criminal investigation of Maxwell does not justify a stay of discovery. "[A] stay of a civil case to permit conc